11 kuukautta sitten
Celestino Pereira
Celestino Pereira 15 tuntia sitten
Well, yes and no... a plane fly because of the airflow speed trough the wings generates lift. So if you speed the air trough the wings the airplane can fly. For example one Propeller aircraft in theory can generate enough air flow speed to create lift. And a jet engine also can do this, if you put the jet engine in a position that the thrust generate enough airflow and that air go trough the wings then the plane fly. This is just theoric, i don´t know any airplane with the engines in that position or a propeller airplane that can do that. more the helicopter fly without wings, just with a giant propeller :)
Paul Faulkner
Paul Faulkner 16 tuntia sitten
I live in Chesterfield....
Mitchell Rice
Mitchell Rice 16 tuntia sitten
Yes the plane can take off, as it is not the wheels driving the plane forward. Rather the thrust is propelling the plane. The wheels will just spin faster and the plane will move forward and eventually take off. This scenario only works if the conveyor is as long as a run way though
ENGİN 16 tuntia sitten
Waiting wind limits video. Especially tail and head wind limits are limited by what?
BD47 16 tuntia sitten
Starlux with the call sign starwalker
Varun Sikka
Varun Sikka 16 tuntia sitten
Wow, the legacy of portside and starboard still exists.
MusikCassette 16 tuntia sitten
would it not save even more fuel to taxi just on the APU?
Kiko Friesen
Kiko Friesen 17 tuntia sitten
Neat! This sorta reminds me of that episode from Mythbusters where they tried that out. Cool channel by the way!
Александр Стручков
Александр Стручков 17 tuntia sitten
I know the answer before you asking it. Answer is yes.
Brad Johnson
Brad Johnson 17 tuntia sitten
Mike Palmer
Mike Palmer 17 tuntia sitten
Excellent video Joe.
Flying Ratbag
Flying Ratbag 17 tuntia sitten
FO Joe. I did it in 4 years.
Enut Peanut
Enut Peanut 17 tuntia sitten
no, no, the Pilatus PC-24's yoke isn't a PlayStation controller! It has PC in the name!
Jacob Benosky
Jacob Benosky 17 tuntia sitten
last time i checked spinning wheels dont generate lift lol.....
fibbo obbif
fibbo obbif 18 tuntia sitten
I wonder why this cargo plane (or maybe other cargo planes) did not use the nearest runway (in this case 07R) to land...
Bill Green
Bill Green 18 tuntia sitten
Thrust is against the air and not the ground. If the wheels provided the force to move forward the plane would remain in position.
1robbond 18 tuntia sitten
Carlos H
Carlos H 18 tuntia sitten
Engines, wheels, belts moving one direction or another, slow or fast... it's all irrelevant. Air over the wings is the only thing that matters.
Benen Sddbekfjj
Benen Sddbekfjj 18 tuntia sitten
One flies and the other one stays on the ground.
FlightMariner 18 tuntia sitten
See this being discussed “again” in one of the GA Facebook groups... seriously. 🙄
The secular humanist
The secular humanist 19 tuntia sitten
No bcs the plane needs to go fast enough to have enough air flowing over the wings to generate enough lift to take off.
Ian Clare
Ian Clare 19 tuntia sitten
No, because the airflow over the wings does not match the speed and will not generate any lift.
LEMMY LEMON 19 tuntia sitten
At least airplanes are getting some exercise after a long quarantine 😂
Luigi Tenneriello
Luigi Tenneriello 19 tuntia sitten
Well, it can take off... if the belt goes at something like 1000 or 2000 km/h. The belt will move air back, and this generates lift. (The plane will not go very far though)
Jeffry747 19 tuntia sitten
Need airflow over the wings to generate lift. You can spin the wheels on the conveyor belt all you want, but if the plane is sitting still, it will not lift off.
Divin Plackattu
Divin Plackattu 19 tuntia sitten
departures from Boeing and Airbus to runways
Fernando Torres Leiva
Fernando Torres Leiva 19 tuntia sitten
Thanks for the video. Please what happened to that airplane that landed with the nose wheel twisted. Thanks in advance
Mindaugas Berteska
Mindaugas Berteska 19 tuntia sitten
no, it can't because engines has to provide trust, and trust provides lift, and if there is no trust, it's imposible to get plane airborne
Josse 19 tuntia sitten
The answer is yes as the plane accelerates, using the engines and not the wheels
Avve 19 tuntia sitten
It won't take off as theres no airflow towards the plane.
diecicatorce 20 tuntia sitten
Now the title goes to Rednose from Norwegian!
Rob DeBiaso
Rob DeBiaso 20 tuntia sitten
I’m gonna tell my kids this was Paul Rudd....kidding. Awesome content!
Jim Mork
Jim Mork 20 tuntia sitten
One of the flaws in the airplane design was allowing it to be shut off. That fact was pointed out almost immediately. Some said "Oh, there are times when the crew should be able to shut it off." But the fact it was not running has cost millions and millions spent to not find the plane.
dingoProductionsuk 20 tuntia sitten
Your a pilot and you got this wrong?? Come on @captin joe. This was tested 10 years ago and demonstrated the plane will take off. You know a plane gets no forward momentum from the whells it gets it from the engines
Сергей Смирнов
Сергей Смирнов 20 tuntia sitten
The whole point was that conveyor cant exactly match speed of the wheels. Engines produce trust that pushes plane forward. So wheels need to start spinning. As soon as they start conveyor will match their speed. Buy Thrust still pushing plane forward so the wheels need no spin faster. And this wheels-conveyor accelerations continues to infinity. But infinity speed is not possible so the riddle doesn't make sense. That is what he was trying to tell.
eM Pe
eM Pe 20 tuntia sitten
AeroPlaneSpotter 20 tuntia sitten
Checklist completed. Check
David Williams
David Williams 20 tuntia sitten
IFR = I Follow Roads
Kenneth 20 tuntia sitten
Answer is Yes. Mythbusters did an episode on this. The means of kinetic energy comes from the engines in the form of thrust not from revolving the wheels like in cars.
jaksap 20 tuntia sitten
Two additional questions. Can the converyorbelt motion make the plane airborne without the engines? Does Earth rotation impact the airplane liftoff (e.g. in equatorial regions)?
Marvin Chitwood
Marvin Chitwood 21 tunti sitten
Trump just bought the patent !!!
Alex Spencer
Alex Spencer 21 tunti sitten
Whoo hooo my birthday.
Givens Tours
Givens Tours 21 tunti sitten
Thank's a lot Captain Joe. I've just started with my class for PPL and tou channel is very helpful. Thank you
Sinan Donmez
Sinan Donmez 21 tunti sitten
Airspeed causes lift, not the wheelspeed lol
Paul Furniss
Paul Furniss 21 tunti sitten
Didn't watch the video, but it's pretty obvious that the plane would take off. The engines push the plane regardless of what it's standing on.
Squawkleo 21 tunti sitten
Yep, that's me. Long sleeves all that round. Small sacrifice though...
Igor Bogdanović
Igor Bogdanović 21 tunti sitten
Hmmm... l hope I'm not the only one, who can imagine other stuff going on there, not just sleeping...
Enef56 21 tunti sitten
An Historian that thinks England is Britain, millions of non English People died defending the UK. England this and England that, yes England is a powerful nation but they wouldn’t have won any wars alone. The Scots, Irish and Welsh along with all our other allies paid a dear price defending this country and shouldn’t be overlooked.
Puer Latinophilus
Puer Latinophilus 21 tunti sitten
Where did you come from, where did you go? Where did you come from, Captian Joe?
Elie Meyr kahana
Elie Meyr kahana 21 tunti sitten
no !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Elie Meyr kahana
Elie Meyr kahana 21 tunti sitten
It s like usa down
Jim Kvasnicka
Jim Kvasnicka 22 tuntia sitten
No. No lift. In reality, the engines' thrust doesn't care about the conveyor belt, and will propel the plane forward, though, overpinning the wheels on the conveyor belt. However, rather than a conveyor belt, can a 747 theoretically take off in a 184 MPH eadwind (184 mph being the 747's required speed for takeoff), assuming the plane will eventuall have to transition from the 184 mph headwind to some other headwind, crosswind, or tailwind?
Left Flamingo
Left Flamingo 22 tuntia sitten
Regardless of the wording, the reasoning is wrong. The wheels only spin as a function of the thrust from the engines causing the aircraft to move forward. So for the wheels to spin, there would first be forward movement. As the wheels are free spinning, there is no force preventing the forward motion created by the engine thrust. In Capt. Joe's reasoning, we increase ground speed to take off. This isn't true of course, only an effect. Only airspeed affects the takeoff, and is always greater than the ground speed, save for dead calm conditions. In either case, the plane would take off. This was a subject of a Mythbusters episode many years ago. I was very surprised that Adam and Jamie thought that the moving runway would inhibit the takeoff. It was quite clear that the aircraft would take off.
Rocket Spark
Rocket Spark 19 tuntia sitten
Nope , just wrong - in the case above the aircraft would not take off
Dominique Nogueras
Dominique Nogueras 22 tuntia sitten
The Mythbusters did an experiment about this
HERNAN SENOREN 22 tuntia sitten
In the Navy gas turbine ship I recall actual call "Engineering casualty, engineering casualty, class B fire 1B GTM, MER1. This is not a drill". Repetitive training does pay off in the actual casualty. It save lives. Prevent further damage and costly repairs.
John Buyers
John Buyers 22 tuntia sitten
I remember hearing someone describe the take off as sounding “like an angel howling it’s way back to Heaven.”
Simone Basilico
Simone Basilico 22 tuntia sitten
Minchia zio che sfigato che sei
Bernard Jas
Bernard Jas 22 tuntia sitten
No, it can't take of. It is nog moving against the wind and therefore there is no lift!
dnxtbillgates 22 tuntia sitten
Yes, the Smart Fully Automated Routing/Taxi vehicle. The Smart FART.
Elie Meyr kahana
Elie Meyr kahana 22 tuntia sitten
merci monsieur simplement merci vous êtes dubitatif . merci monsieur
shafin shimanto
shafin shimanto 22 tuntia sitten
I just completed my high school. Now after watching this video Im too confused what to do should I join a Flying school first or should I get myself admitted in a university and after getting a degree from there then get back to aviation..............
Max Power
Max Power 22 tuntia sitten
I think the way this instance of the riddle is worded, we have a circular dependency which would cause the ground wheel rotation to accelerate with no upper limit? The ground wheel speed is dependent on the speed of the ground relative to the aircraft. If the aircraft was suspended in a vice or some kind of armature, say, the wheels would rotate normally with the speed of the conveyor belt. Now we introduce a new dependency- the conveyor belt speed is locked to the speed of the wheels, but rotating in the opposite direction. I think the way that is worded means that it would tend to accelerate the speed of the wheels. So if the ground tends to accelerate the wheels, and the wheels accelerate the ground (conveyor belt), I think we have a feedback loop that, as a practical matter, ends in the mechanical destruction of system components. I think this runaway increase in wheel and conveyor belt speed would be triggered by the slightest motion of the wheels relative to the conveyor belt, and might not require the jet to make any meaningful actions at all. It would probably just randomly trigger with the jet sitting on the belt.
CaE 22 tuntia sitten
It wont have thrust cause it would sit in the same place so it wouldnt create lift
ThePoisond 22 tuntia sitten
Can't be always; he decided not to be a dentist!
oliver ottis
oliver ottis 22 tuntia sitten
my faforite plane is boeing747
Preetam Baitharu
Preetam Baitharu 23 tuntia sitten
"What we should buy ?? " Joe : "Product with Decency !!!"
Duane Antor
Duane Antor 23 tuntia sitten
Of course not. They have a recoil starter where you have to pull a rope.
Bruh 23 tuntia sitten
Boeing is better. More spacious and more comforting
Benedikt 23 tuntia sitten
Not sure if my solution to this riddle is correct, I would love to see it being discussed in a video: (juristication: Germany/Europe) You are a student pilot on the day of you exam and your examiner waits for you on an other airfield. Your instructor gives you a written flight order to fly to that airfield and back, making it legal for you as a student to fly there alone. What happens if you do not pass your exam? What happens if you pass your exam? [CAUTION spoiler!] . . . . If you fail, your instructor's flight order allows you to fly home. If you pass, you'll need a taxi. Since you passed, you are no longer a flight student and cannot fly with a flight order from "your" instructor. Since issuing a license takes a few days, you are not a licensed pilot either. So if you fail your flight test, you may fly home on your own. If you are good at flying and pass it, you may not fly home. Is this true?
bignards101 23 tuntia sitten
Since the plane doesnt use its wheels to propel itself on takeoff the conveyor is a moot point and doesnt do anything for takeoff
J Pol
J Pol Päivä sitten
They made a tight left u turn and could have lined up for the runway they took off from. That would have been the quickest route to landing. My question is why would they buy time in the air by passing up that runway and circling in from the opposite direction, just to complete the checklists, when they could have set down sooner? Should a crippled air craft try to stay in the air to complete checklists if they are inline for a much quicker landing? That seems like they are taking a much bigger chance of crashing by staying up! Please clear up this question of landing immediately or staying aloft to complete checklists! I feel they should have landed sooner on the same runway without completing checklists since it was offered to them. Thanks. Great video. Jpol.
danysf 96
danysf 96 Päivä sitten
The next ad FIpost showed me was for a conveyer belt company. thx Captain Joe.
Daniel G
Daniel G Päivä sitten
I hope the entire flight crew gets a raise.
Sandy Tidwell
Sandy Tidwell Päivä sitten
I remember when Delta retired the last L1011. It got a water salute before taking off. Very emotional as the L1011s were used a lot ATL to FLL. Back in the day, I was weekly passenger, and it was such a pleasure. My favorite plane ever. The water salute seemed so perfect.
the art of technology
the art of technology Päivä sitten
Just4Fun Päivä sitten
Does the digital era has changed how the documents of the aircraft and crew are handled or its till stick to old pen and paper? or maybe a good combo of both🤔
ToxicVaccines ToxicFluoride HIV HOAX
ToxicVaccines ToxicFluoride HIV HOAX Päivä sitten
What happened to the exes fuel on the plane? I understand pilots must dump in the air the remaining fuel on the fuel tanks before landing to reduce the risk of fire.
Vidur Mathur
Vidur Mathur Päivä sitten
It’s basically a treadmill for airplanes
Adam T
Adam T Päivä sitten
"always point skyward", instructions unclear, jacked up the front of my front wheel drive car and now I can't go anywhere